Book I, Chapters 1 - 5

Ch. 1

So, today's thought (as I begin re-reading myself): Take your time with the first chapter, particularly with anything Eliot is telling you about Dorothea (introduced as "Miss Brooke"; she'll be referred to this way in other places too). Celia isn't all that important in the novel, but she's important here as a contrast to Dorothea. Also, it might be a bit subtle, but there IS some humor in this opening chapter, particularly the way Celia pokes at Dorothea and kind of undermines her older sister's high-mindedness. Celia sees that D. has grand ideas and convictions but that she's also a little lacking in self-awareness. Finally, Dorothea is "religious" in a sense, but maybe not in the conventional way we think of that. It's more that she has this over-riding sense of piousness / goodness / correct behavior. And particularly the notion of self-abasement in a quasi-religious sense. She thinks she should suffer / deny herself worldly pleasures. This connects with the preface about Saint Theresa.

One other thought: I'm not going to go back and count how often it is used, but I know that the word ardent appears more than once in Eliot's description of Dorothea. It's a word critics (including Mead, twice in her brief essay) use frequently as well. I know what it means, but I've looked it up because I want to see if there's anything I'm missing:




Seeing the first example ("an ardent baseball fan") disappoints me; it doesn't feel like enough. But when we add the sense of "burning" and "glowing," now we're getting somewhere. 

Oh, and with minimal Google sleuthing, I see that someone has created a program/page to do exactly what I was too lazy to do, namely find when that word appears in the text. So, it's nice to know I wasn't imagining it: The word appears once in the brief Preface, and seven times in Chapter 1. In any case, it's an apt word to associate with Dorothea: she is certainly passionate in her various states of being and endeavors—though at the start of the novel, only in a high-minded and almost diffuse sense. Diffuse: it's not clear (to her or to us) what end her passions will be put to.

*    *    *

Ch. 2

I've mentally moved on from this chapter, so I'll just take a moment to say that what's important here is the introduction to Casaubon, who will be a key figure in the book. You don't need to expend too much mental energy trying to make sense of his "key to all mythologies" (which is almost comically rendered by Eliot), but you should be trying to understand why/how Dorothea is drawn to him more than to the youthful, handsome Sir James.

Ch. 3

I described Dorothea as lacking in self-awareness above, but it becomes clear in Chapters 2 and 3 that she's also not particularly keen at recognizing what seems obvious (to most of us, as readers) about others. Eliot uses the omniscient narration to make it clear that Sir James Chettam is interested in Dorothea rather than Celia, but Dorothea is utterly oblivious to this fact. For me, these moments represent somewhat rare flashes of comedy in the novel; D's irritation with Chettam amuses me, anyway: 

Miss Brooke was annoyed at the interruption.This amiable baronet, really a suitable husband for Celia, exaggerated the necessity of making himself agreeable to the elder sister. Even a prospective brother-in-law may be an oppression if he will always be presupposing too good an understanding with you, and agreeing with you even when you contradict him.

In the next moment, her face flushes with angry, impatient color, and clever Eliot describes the response: "Sir James interpreted the heightened colour in the way most gratifying to himself [in other words: he thinks she's flushed with passion for him], and thought he never saw Miss Brooke looking so handsome."

What I notice now is that this interplay is part of a theme in the book: misapprehension and misunderstanding, particularly when it is is self-serving. As I frequently ask myself when reading this novel, Do I do that? (I'm sure I do.) And: How do we prevent ourselves from falling into such foolishness?


Ch. 4

It's interesting to consider how my thinking about Dorothea has evolved over the years. I think I've always held her in high regard, but reading these opening chapters now I keep seeing her fallibilities. In this chapter, she repeatedly chides Celia, even accusing her of having "petty thoughts." She strikes me at this moment as immature, childish, churlish.

Her uncle returns from a visit to Lowick (home to Casaubon) and he discusses with Dorothea the prospects of these two men, Chettam and Casaubon; clearly he prefers the former, though he is careful to grant Dorothea the authority to make her own choice. He is confused by her lack of enthusiasm for Chettam; along the way, he delivers a handful of revealing lines (amid his general meandering and repetitive way), like this one:

The fact is, I never loved any one enough to put myself into a noose for them. It is a noose, you know. Temper, now. There is temper. And a husband likes to be master.

Dorothea claims to know all this, to be prepared for "trials." A question for the reader at this stage: Do you think she is?


Ch. 5

Maybe my mind is in sloppy state this winter, but I keep finding humor in scenes that never amused me before. For example: Casaubon's letter to Dorothea is so abstruse (at least to me) that it borders on the ridiculous. I assume this is intentional on Eliot's part. In any case, what matters about his letter (don't struggle to disentangle his prose) is more what he doesn't say than what he does. On this point, note the disconnect between what he has / hasn't said and how Dorothea responds in her own letter. 

Also in this chapter, Dorothea and Celia talk about Casaubon; it doesn't go well. My own take on these two young women continues to shape-shift. For a time, I've found myself on Celia's side—finding her sensible, reasonable, and generally more perceptive than her sister. Now, though, she reveals a less admirable side of herself: petty, shallow, almost caustic in her revulsion to Casaubon. 

What I remember always having felt in Chapters 3 - 5 (and feeling again today) is an inner voice screaming, "Don't do it, Dorothea!"

You?

*    *    *

Practical notes for first-time readers: Mr. Brooke, uncle and guardian of Dorothea and Celia, is a minor character in the novel; he provides comic relief in the form of his rambling, frequently incoherent speech-making, but he's not particularly important. Which is not to say he's not interesting, or that Eliot didn't put care into his rendering. Without giving too much away (because Mr. Brooke does shift roles slightly later in the novel), I find him interesting for his confused nostalgia and his efforts to be both agreeable and contrarian. One element of his character to pay attention to: His role as guardian. To what degree should he guide or control the choices available to his young-ish and inexperienced nieces?





Comments

  1. Regarding Dorothea's 'ardency'...she's also described as "Methodistical," said in a deprecating or insulting way. But Eliot liked Methodism. That part reminds me of Adam Bede, where Adam's eventual wife is a Methodist preacher who redeems Adam. It totally makes sense that Dorothea is kind of Methodist-y even if she's not specifically a Methodist: they allowed women preachers at least in some branches; they were associated with working-class improvement (hence, her passion for improving the tenants' cottages, but also the taint of potential class slippage); and they were associated with a belief in the redeeming power of God's love in general (and as much as Eliot kind of pokes fun at Dorothea, she also clearly appreciates Dorothea's open, sincere belief in the possibility of self-improvement). It's not an aspect I'd paid much attention to in my last reading, but for whatever reason this time it put me in mind of Adam Bede.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I see that—the Methodist-y connection to Adam Bede; I have a complicated history with that novel, and while I appreciate it, in my mind Eliot had moved beyond what may have been a firmer faith in Methodism (to redeem; to guide?). I know you're not saying that Bede is on par with Middlemarch as a literary work, so I won't try to argue that Middlemarch is "better." But it seems to me that in Bede, Eliot has cast Methodism as a key component to a life of honesty/integrity/goodness. And that's certainly not the case in Middlemarch (right??). So NOW I'm interested (in other words: thanks for pointing me in this direction) in how this character trait in Dorothea might evolve (or not) over the course of the novel. (Trying not to give anything away here.)

    And I love your description of the "taint of potential class slippage"—I don't think I recognized it as that (though it makes complete sense). I was reading it more as rooted in sexism: "Women don't get involved with buildings—that's men's work"; and "Stick to piano and singing and walking among the lime trees looking pretty."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I, too, am struck by the humor on this rereading! I didn’t remember there being so many laugh-out-loud moments. Maybe Eliot gets funnier as I get older. (So many things do!)

    I recall that the first time I read this book, when I was somewhat closer in age to Dorothea, I identified with her eccentricities and spiritual passions and especially her yearning to do something meaningful with her life. Now I notice more clearly the gentle irony with which Eliot deals with her heroine’s youthful errors. Calling out “misapprehensions” is apt: blinded by her own idealism, Dorothea misapprehends Casaubon so disastrously that the reader feels a sense of real danger. Since marriage and childbirth could be fatal for 19th-century women (especially, in literature, women who make questionable decisions!), all Dorothea’s ardor and maybe even her life itself are at stake.

    I’m also struck—as always, but especially this time around—by the breadth of Eliot’s compassionate understanding of human nature in all its variety. For a few months recently I was immersed in a Charlotte Brontë project (talk about ardent!), and for all their fire and brilliance, Jane Eyre and Lucy Snowe’s worlds are claustrophobic little hothouses. By contrast, Eliot’s scope feels as expansive as the world itself, which is perhaps why it yields so many rewards and surprises on successive readings.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have to be honest, this book is a rough read. My attention wanders and it will take at least a dozen rereads to fully know this book, especially with my eyes tendency to skim. But, to answer your question on what I find interesting about the book, I have to say it is surprisingly humorous.
    Don't get me wrong, I'm not having to set it down to giggle to myself, but instead it is almost a treasure hunt finding all the dry comedy encased in it. Sir James and Miss Brooke's encounters are endlessly amusing due to misunderstandings on both sides, Mr. Brooke is a ridiculous man to have to "listen" to and is all the more humorous for it, Sir James himself is always amusing it seems but especially in his jealousy towards Casaubon, the absolute gossipy nature of the townswomen are great fun, and the Vincy children's squabbles are both relatable and fun to read. The prose may be a rough read at times, but the characters themselves are engaging, if occasionally more caricatures than characters.
    On the relationship of Mr. Casaubon and Miss Brooke... I'm struggling with my opinion on this relationship. At first I thought it very quaint and endearing, someone who can match wits per se with Dorothea, who listens to her talk instead of remaining in blind agreement like a certain Sir James... Plus it was rather Beauty and the Beast-esque, Dorothea's disregard to Edward's overall age and visage, in light of his mind and good heart.
    And then I continued reading. (More on my opinions of their relationship in the next blog post!)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Following are several paragraphs of my thoughts and personal summary, one for each chapter, with some added comments in deference to Fred's own post:

    Chapter I: “Sisters, Religion, and Jewels– Oh My!”
    In Chapter one we are introduced to Dorothea, Celia, and their uncle, Mr. Brooks.
    Both women are described as fair, with a certain emphasis on especially Dorothea’s beauty, despite how plainly they dress. Dorothea is often compared to her younger sister, many thinking she is overly extreme and eccentric in her piety and religion. Celia, on the other hand is seen as more level headed, and fits more in how a young lady of her standing should act and behave.
    Dorothea, due to her devotion to her religion, refers to it in every aspect and choice in her life. From how she dresses, how she acts, and how she views potential marriage prospects. She also allows it to influence how she interacts, and what she expects, from her sister. Regardless of this though, she clearly loves her sister, and does not hold her to the same exacting standards that she holds herself to. She doesn’t begrudge her sister their mothers jewels, for example, but in begrudging herself them, she inadvertently hurts her sister regardless. The relationship between Dorothea and her sister Celia seems slightly complicated, but the way I see it is that despite Dorothea's strict piety, she does not begrudge her sister the same things she begrudges herself, nor looks down on her for her own opinions and desires. The problem is, when Dorothea refuses her own base desires (like her mothers jewels), it makes Celia feel as if she IS looking down on her. Because if it is bad form for Dorothea, surely she must think badly of Celia for much the same. I believe (or wish to believe) that Dorothea wishes nothing but her sister's happiness (shown when she immediately jumps to Gran the jewelry when Celia mentions wishing to wear them), but there is miscommunication for Celia in which she feels less than in the eyes of her sister. I have a weird relationship with religion and those overtly religious, at least in a Catholic sense. That's why I hope I'm reading this correctly. In my mind, Dorothea's piety is a virtue, unless she is weaponizing it against those close to her.
    Note: My poor feminine heart cannot see the word "ardent" without reminiscing in a swooning manner of another piece of literature, when Mr. Darcy swears he loves Miss Bennet "most ardently." This is completely unhelpful in regards to this text, but I couldn't resist not commenting on it anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you've got it exactly right. I don't think Dorothea judges her sister (much)—she just can't help holding herself to some imagined higher standard. And I love that you connect this with P&P!

      Delete
    2. I liked the P&P connection too! But I was thinking of S&S with the contrast between the sisters. I bet Eliot liked Austen :).

      Delete
  6. Chapter II: “A Most Unwanted Suitor”
    Chapter 2 is overall a humorous one, from Mr. Brooke’s blustering braggart ways, to Sir James Chettam’s single-minded, oblivious courting of Miss Brooke. A relatively short chapter, its significance only lies in fleshing out our characters and relationships. Miss Brooke clearly has no interest in Chettam’s advances, and is more taken in with the brilliance of mind that Mr. Casaubon possesses. In another facet we see more juxtaposition between the two Brooke sisters, as Celia shows vanity in the face of Mr. Casaubon’s appearance, while Dorothea has no such hold backs. Mr. Brooke clearly undermines his nieces with regularity, and is more similar in personality to Chettam than to Casaubon. We as readers get views into the sexism of the time, and also see a depth to Dorothea that goes beyond her piety, a backbone and an independent mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr. Brooke wishes he were more similar to Chettam, that handsome young man-about-town! But you're right that he's nothing like Casaubon....

      Delete
  7. Chapter III: “A Wanted Suitor, and The Problem with Puppies”
    Chapter three the reader is drawn into Dorothea’s daydreams of her illustrious Mr. Casaubon, and her desires of marrying him. Interrupting her fantasies while she’s out on a walk is none other than her other oblivious suitor, Sir James Chettam. Sir James tries to woo her with a maltese puppy, and hilariously misreads all of Dorothea’s body language like many young men are often to do. He stumbles unwittingly on the one topic Dorothea actually enjoys gushing about, her cottage designs. In his attempt to woo her, he agrees to put some of her plans into motion on his estate, and she is ecstatic for it, and is quick to pour over plans she has drawn up with him.
    Note: I agree that much of Dorothea's faults begin to come to light in this chapter, and what is a good character without faults? That being said, I'm finding her mildly exasperating, and more so as the story goes on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said. I LOVE your playful titles for these chapters.

      Delete
  8. Chapter IV: “Talks of Marriage, and other Miserable Things”
    Chapter four we really see the plot picking up as Mr. Brooke returns from Lowick, the estate of Casaubon, with a letter for Dorothea and the announcement that Casaubon asked for permission to engage Miss Brooke. Mr. Brooke offers some ominous, if not truthful, warnings about marriage to Dorothea, but she seems happily deaf to his misgivings. I wonder if perhaps this is not foreshadowing for an unhappy marriage yet to come. I think that Dorothea believes she knows what the “trials” of marriage contain, but for all her goodness I cannot help but find her both naive, and somewhat willfully ignorant of her true situation in life.
    Note: For all of Mr. Brooke's blustering, I cannot say I agree with his preference of Chettam, nor his warnings about the folly of marriage in this time for young women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. . . . and other Miserable Things. That got a BIG laugh out of me.

      Is there a word missing in your final sentence, or do you really think Chettam would NOT be a better match for D?

      Delete
    2. I like the chapter titles too, especially this one! And Fred, I *don't* think Chettam would be a good match. Better match than Casaubon? Maybe, but that is a low bar. She'd be so bored with Chettam once those cottages were built.

      Delete
  9. Chapter V: “Letters, and more Misunderstandings”
    The letter from Casaubon was an interesting read. On one hand you feel some of Dorothea’s excitement in receiving it, you can almost see it through her eyes, how she could gleen adoration and confession from its words. The superfluous writing of Casaubon’s letter feels nothing more than mirage. A well crafted, but in the end empty, proposal. A proposal I’m sure he would not have made if he did not feel so secure in Dorothea’s blind admiration. Her letter back to him sends a slight shudder of second hand embarrassment through me to read it. “I am very grateful to you for loving me,” she writes. Firstly, Dorothea, please show us readers where in fact he confessed his love. And second, imagine responding to any marriage proposal first and foremost with “Wow, thanks.” Truly, Dorothea stresses me out sometimes.
    Note: Celia in this chapter comes of as the epitome of a sulky younger sister. She is definitely a touch vain in her views, but I also think these remarks against Casaubon come from a place of both worry, for her sister, and a selfish desire to not have such a lifeless brother in law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great stuff, Jay! "Wow, thanks" = legendary. And the fact that D "stresses [you] out." Me too, especially in this part of the novel.

      Delete
  10. I'm loving these chapter titles, too!

    Casaubon's letter has got to be the most solipsistic (and cringe-ily virginal) proposal ever. UGH. And poor Dorothea is so touched and honored by it. "Wow, thanks," indeed!!

    I agree that Celia is genuinely worried for her sister. I like Celia more than ever on this re-reading, despite her small flaws.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Cringe-ily virginal" gave me an LLOL. (adding literally, in the traditional sense of that word).

      I'm with you on liking Celia much more this time around. For some reason, I'm now picturing her as a modern-era teenager rolling her eyes at Dorothea and mumbling "Whatever" while walking away....

      Delete
  11. Jay, I hope it doesn't seem weird that some total stranger is reading and commenting on your project! Fred probably explained that I'm a friend, and because I love this book so much, he invited me to read along. I probably won't have time to follow thoroughly and consistently, but I'm really enjoying your good thoughts so far.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I can't believe I just stumbled on this blog. I first read MM at age 40--the perfect age to read this novel, I think--and have since read it three more times. I am 71 now, and never have I laughed so much at Eliot's wicked humor. I'm also astonished afresh at her expansive mind, her knowledge of the tragedy and silliness of the human condition, and her empathy for even the most loathsome characters. (Lookin' at you, Casaubon.) I'm beginning Book Six, but I'm going to read all these posts before I resume. Thanks so much for this!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just saw your email — thanks for writing, and I'll be following up there.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Preparations

Book VI: The Widow and the Wife